Sep 18, 2026 · 5 min read

Remediating a KEV entry that names no product version

CISA gave three days to remediate two Linux kernel CVEs that name no product version. The fixed version is in your distro tracker, not the NVD range.

Article header: Remediating a KEV entry that names no product version

CISA added two Linux kernel flaws to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on September 18, 2026, in catalog version 2026.09.18: CVE-2025-39964, a race condition in the AF_ALG crypto socket interface, and CVE-2026-53266, an out-of-bounds write in the ebtables SNAT target. Both carry a remediation due date of September 21 — three days — and both are flagged for forensic triage, as 57 of the catalog's 1,715 entries are. The vendor field on both reads Linux and the product field reads Kernel — not a vendor you can call, and not a product with a version. The notes field carries fifteen git.kernel.org stable-commit URLs and nothing you can hand to a package manager.

Why the version table returns the wrong answer

NVD's CPE data for CVE-2026-53266 lists nine upstream ranges, 5.4.73 through 7.0.13, covering every live LTS branch. Matching uname -r against those ranges is the obvious move, and on any enterprise distribution it answers wrong in both directions.

Red Hat shipped the fix for CVE-2026-53266 in RHEL 9 as kernel-5.14.0-687.23.1.el9_8 (RHSA-2026:36645, July 8) and in RHEL 8 as kernel-4.18.0-553.143.1.el8_10 (RHSA-2026:39083, July 14). The patched RHEL 9 kernel still reports 5.14.0, which sits inside the 5.11 to 5.15.210 range and will match it permanently. The patched RHEL 8 kernel reports 4.18.0, which falls below every range in the table — so upstream matching calls a machine clean that Red Hat itself shipped an advisory for. A backport does not move the version string; that is what it is for. It is the same trap as a vendor's fixed version sitting inside a later affected range, from the opposite direction.

The severity numbers do not settle it either. For CVE-2025-39964 the Linux CNA scores 7.8 with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, NVD's primary metric is 3.3 with C:N/I:N/A:L, and Red Hat rates it Moderate at 5.5 — "crash the system or corrupt cryptographic operation results." For CVE-2026-53266 the CNA scores 8.8 at AV:L, NVD publishes no primary score at all, and Red Hat scores it 7.5 at AV:N — network, not local. CISA's SSVC decision points on both read exploitation active, technical impact total, automatable no. The three-day clock comes from none of those scores: BOD 26-04 sets it from exposure, KEV status, automatability and technical impact, and CVSS is not one of the four.

The practice: resolve the fix through your distribution, per boot boundary

The required action on both entries is "apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions." The vendor is not kernel.org — it is whoever built the kernel you are running, and theirs is the only tracker mapping these commits onto an installable package version.

That resolution is not uniform. Ubuntu marks CVE-2026-53266 fixed in 26.04 at 7.0.0-31.31 and both 24.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS as "Vulnerable, work in progress" — no fix for the two most-deployed LTS releases on the day the clock started. Red Hat lists RHEL 10 as Affected and RHEL for NVIDIA 26 as Will not fix. For CVE-2025-39964, Ubuntu has shipped fixes across every supported release, while Red Hat records Fix deferred on RHEL 7 through 10 and offers a mitigation instead: prevent the af_alg module from loading. One CVE, opposite instructions.

Collect the running kernel per boot boundary, not per asset record and not per container image. Containers share the host kernel, so a base image has no kernel of its own and scanning images tells you nothing here. Then check installed against running: a kernel package updated but not booted is not remediated, and needs-restarting -r on RHEL or /var/run/reboot-required on Debian and Ubuntu decides it.

The cost is the reason this gets deferred: every kernel fix is a reboot on every host, which is a maintenance window per machine rather than a push. Live patching — kpatch, Ubuntu Livepatch, KernelCare — converts that window into a licence line item, and it does not cover appliance firmware or a kernel your vendor has not patched yet. Where you cannot reboot this week, both bugs have a precondition you can remove instead — the same move as resolving an advisory's precondition against your own running configuration before triaging on severity.

What to check this week

  • uname -r on every bare-metal host, VM, hypervisor and Kubernetes node, and separately for each microVM runtime (Kata, Firecracker, gVisor). If that list does not exist, producing it is the deliverable, not the patch.
  • For each distinct kernel, the status in your distribution's tracker for both CVE IDs — Red Hat's CVE pages, the Ubuntu CVE tracker, SUSE's — not the NVD range.
  • needs-restarting -r or /var/run/reboot-required, separating hosts that are patched from hosts that have only downloaded a patch.
  • lsmod | grep af_alg for the CVE-2025-39964 precondition, and ebtables -t nat -L for SNAT rules that rewrite the ARP sender hardware address, which is the CVE-2026-53266 precondition Red Hat names in its mitigation.
  • Which appliances will not give you a kernel version at all. For those the answer comes from the vendor's advisory, and the interim control is network placement and who holds a local account on the box.

Timeline: CVE-2025-39964 was published on October 13, 2025 and CVE-2026-53266 on June 25, 2026. Red Hat shipped the RHEL 9 fix for CVE-2026-53266 on July 8, 2026. CISA added both CVEs to the KEV catalog on September 18, 2026 - 340 days after the first was published, 85 days after the second, and 72 days after the Red Hat fix - with a remediation due date of September 21, 2026, a three-day window.

Both entries are marked for forensic triage, so where a host in scope was reachable by a local account you do not control, the question is not only which kernel it runs but what ran on it before the reboot.


North InfoSec runs AI-assisted penetration testing and security assessments, including the host inventory and configuration review described above. northinfosec.com

← All articles